CHARLOTTE COURT HOUSE It seems everyone is talking trash in Charlotte
County.
Landfill trash, that is, since it became known that Allied Waste
Industries Inc. has purchased 1,600 acres in Mecklenburg, Lunenburg and
Charlotte counties hoping to build an approximately 250-acre landfill on
the Charlotte portion.
Since the proposal became common knowledge late last year, the company
and local officials and residents have been fortifying their
positions.
The Scottsdale, Ariz.-based company says the project would benefit
Charlotte County with jobs and revenue. Charlotte officials insist the
project is only a proposal in its first stages. Opponents fear that the
deal already might be a foregone conclusion.
The debate is not surprising. Traditionally, prisons and landfills are
neighbors that few want, and grass-roots opposition often rises when such
projects are proposed.
In late December, a joint meeting of the county's Board of Supervisors
and Planning Commission was long and contentious when about 300 people
overflowed from the meeting room during a public hearing on changes to the
zoning ordinance that could pave the way for the landfill.
Most in the crowd were clearly opposed to the landfill proposal.
"Is anybody for this dump?" county resident Vincent Finelli asked in a
request that left the room silent.
Opponents point to the traditional concerns: soil, water and air
pollution, and out-of-state waste.
County officials insist a final decision on the landfill is a long way
off. The landfill would have to get county approval and per- mits from
state and federal environmental agencies.
"Nothing has been decided," County Administrator R.B. Clark said.
Supervisor Nancy Carwile said in an interview last week: "I haven't
promised my vote yes or no. . . . I'm trying to keep an open mind."
In her newsletter mailed out last week to 625 households, Carwile
provided an outline of Allied's presentation to the county, including
company promises of $1 million to the county when the zoning application
is approved, another $1 million when the permits are received from the
state, and $1.4 million when the landfill begins receiving waste. Allied
would pay the county a per-ton fee, with a guarantee of $1 million per
year for the first five years. They also would accept all the county's
trash for free.
"I didn't try to address all the tales that are out [there]," Carwile
said. "I just tried to sit down and explain the proposal in as straight
forward a way as I could."
County officials say the changes to the zoning ordinance and
comprehensive plan that were the subject of the December public hearing
were not directly related to the landfill proposal. The proposed changes
were referred back to the Planning Commission for further examination.
At the behest of the supervisors, Allied's project development manager,
Ted Neura, attended the December meeting and outlined the company's
proposal to clear up the many questions associated with the landfill
proposal and "begin community outreach," he said.
"We don't generate the garbage, we manage it in a way that is in
compliance with state and federal standards," Neura said.
The landfill would not accept certain waste, such as hazardous, medical
and radioactive, he said.
Allied Waste Industries Inc. says that it is the second-largest
non-hazardous solid waste management company in the United States with
annual revenues of more $5 billion and assets of nearly $14 million. It
operates 167 landfills nationwide including three in Virginia -- in
Brunwick, King and Queen and Henrico counties, according to the company's
Web site.
BFI Waste Services, which has been in Virginia for years, is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Allied. Allied's operation in Charlotte is through
Charlotte County Development Co., Neura said.
In Neura's December presentation, and in a several-inches-thick book
about the project and company, Allied says the landfill would generate
nearly $100 million in revenue for the county over the project's
approximately 20-year lifetime. It also estimated the landfill would
purchase about $500,000 in good and services locally every year -- "a boom
to local business," the company said.
It also would create 15 to 20 landfill jobs, 10 to 20 trucking jobs and
an additional 20 to 30 seasonal construction jobs, the company said.
But opponents are not impressed.
"Our position would be we would hope the county decides against the
facility being built," said Michael Town, director of the Virginia chapter
of the Sierra Club. "The company is looking to make money by bringing in
other states' garbage, but that's bad for the county . . . and the
commonwealth. The supervisors should not be blinded by dollar signs and
should do right for the [county.]"