|
Thursday, June 24,
2004
County looking into running the landfill locally
Board continues negotiations with potential
operators
By Jamie
Turner Staff
Writer
Page County continued negotiations with possible new
operators for Battle Creek Landfill this week as Supervisors Charles C.
Ballard (R-Dist. 3) and Carol Lee Fischer Strickler (D-Dist. 5) traveled
to Richmond to meet with investors representing current landfill operator
National Waste Services (NWS) of Virginia.
The Page Board of Supervisors interviewed three
prospective replacement for NWS earlier this month — Republic Services, a
Delaware-based corporation with headquarters in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.;
Allied Waste of Scottsdale, Ariz.; and Enviro Solutions Inc., which is
based out of Northern Virginia.
The talks began after NWS and its financial backer,
Capitol Source Financing of Maryland, decided to sell its stake at Battle
Creek to a new operator. This followed NWS declaring bankruptcy and the
state Department of Environmental Quality shutting down Battle Creek in
early March.
But according to Ballard, all the interested operators
want to keep tonnage levels at an average of at least 1,000 tons per
day.
“Tonnage is the big issue,” Ballard said. “They want to
see the tonnage stay the same as it was before.”
Before Battle Creek closed, NWS was dumping about 1,500
tons of waste per day.
This has citizens serving on a county Landfill Advisory
Committee urging supervisors to explore running Battle Creek as a local
facility without a third party as an operator. Committee members Barbara
Coulter and Jo Ann Smeltzer said this option gives the county more control
over issues like tonnage.
Engineer John McNair of Waynesboro plans to present a
cost analysis and feasibility study on reopening Battle Creek as a
county-run facility this July. McNair had planned to make his presentation
last week, but said he hadn’t received all the information required to
complete his study. He declined to comment on any information he’d
gathered so far.
Still, anticipation is building for McNair’s
presentation.
“This landfill committe can be a big help in gathering
information and exploring all of the options including the operation of a
regional landfill. I am looking forward to hearing John McNair’s report,”
said Coulter. “I think we need to seriously consider all of the
options.”
Coulter, along with other members of the Landfill
Advisory Committee, made a push to explore the locally-run option. Now the
members want to stay in the loop.
“I hope the board will make no decision before the
landfill committee reviews [McNair’s] report and gets back with the
board,” said Smeltzer. “There are options out there to consider.”
The advisory committee has five citizens, one from each
district in the county, plus two county representatives and two officials
from NWS. The citizens include Coulter, Smeltzer, B.A. Womack, Tom Barbour
and Richard Kibler.
County Solid Waste Coordinator Rick Anderson and
landfill employee Linda Minke are also on the advisory board. NWS has not
attended a meeting to date.
The committee was started by the county board this year
to offer input on landfill issues and help develop a strategy for local
solid waste disposal.
The organization of the committee hit a snag when the
DEQ pulled Battle Creek’s operating permit on March 10. But the committee
is now starting to get active as the county hashes out plans to reopen the
local landfill.
For almost five months, Page County has been involved in
court negotiations and closed-door bargaining with NWS and Capital
Source.
The groups now appear to be at an impasse. That impasse,
according to Ballard, revolves around tonnage.
Capital Source and potential operators are looking at
limits of 1,000-plus tons per day. At the same time, local Landfill
Advisory Committee members are calling for limits of 250 to 500 tons.
Natalie
Zuckerman, who serves as an alternate on the committee, challenged the
board to set such lower tonnage limits when and if Battle Creek
reopens.
We can be reached
at pagenews@shentel.net. |