Judge rejects barge testing

Virginia must rewrite its trash barge container regulations, according to a state judge.

Hall Automotive
BY DAVE SCHLECK
247-7430

February 9 2005

RICHMOND -- A judge has rejected the state's testing requirements for trash containers on barges and ordered new rules to ensure that the containers are watertight.

Richmond Circuit Court Judge Randall Johnson's ruling, which will affect a proposed barging operation on the James River, is in response to a lawsuit filed by an environmental group called the James River Association.

The group argued that state regulations passed in 2003 are insufficient, because they only require filling the bottom 24 inches of containers with water to see if they leak. The test didn't seem to live up to a state law that requires such containers to be watertight to prevent garbage juice from spilling during an accident.

Johnson stated in his ruling, which was made public Monday: "The only thing the 24-inch standing water test demonstrates is that the bottom 24 inches of the container does not leak. It demonstrates nothing about the rest of the container, including the door, seams and other joints."

Johnson issued an order calling the 24-inch test invalid and instructing the state to replace it with requirements that fulfill the law's requirements.

A spokeswoman for Waste Management, which helped the state defend the case, said that there still is no timeframe for when the company will start barging up to 6,000 tons of out-of-state trash a day up the James River to the Charles City County landfill.

Environmental groups hailed the ruling.

"This decision will protect the James River and all the rivers in the state," said Sarah Francisco, an attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center, which helped represent the James River Association. "We're just very pleased that the judge saw through their inadequate test."

It is too early to say whether the case would be appealed, said Tim Murtaugh, spokesman for the Virginia attorney general's office. The state has about a month to decide.

"All parties agree that the most important thing is to protect Virginia's natural resources, which is why the board believed it had adopted the toughest regulations in the country," Murtaugh said.

Environmentalists didn't win everything they campaigned for.

The association argued that the public input process for developing the regulations was a sham, because state lawyers had already signed a memorandum of agreement with Waste Management and kept it secret. In the agreement, the state agreed to take steps to pass the 24-inch water test and approve a per-ton fee not to exceed $1.

Johnson pointed out that the agreement was signed by lawyers for the state secretary of natural resources and the director of the state department of environmental quality. But the Waste Management Board, the governing body that actually passed the regulations, was neither party to the agreement nor bound by it, Johnson ruled.

The board - not the court - is the best judge on whether the fee will raise enough money to improve water quality and cover inspection and monitoring of the barges, Johnson said.

Jim Sharp, director of an anti-barge group called Campaign Virginia, said he was disappointed in that part of Johnson's ruling.

"The spirit of open government and that of the Freedom of Information Act is eroded by closed-door settlements that did not see the full light of day until after the regs were adopted," he said.

In addition to the Charles City County barging operation, environmentalists also have their eye on a proposed landfill in Camden County in northeastern North Carolina. A trash disposal company plans to transport out-of-state garbage to the future landfill.

The trash could be barged into Hampton Roads and unloaded onto trucks headed for North Carolina on Route 17. State environmental officials in Hampton Roads discussed with Waste Industries USA the possibility of a port on the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River in Chesapeake about a year ago, according to Bill Hayden, DEQ spokesman.

The state has not received a permit application for such a port, Hayden said.

Copyright © 2005, Daily Press

var st_v=1.0; var st_pg=""; var st_ci="703"; var st_di="d016"; var st_dd="st.sageanalyst.net"; var st_tai="v:1.2.1"; var st_ai="139170"; if (st_v==1.0) { var st_uj; var st_dn = (new Date()).getTime(); var st_rf = escape(document.referrer); st_uj = "//"+st_dd+"/"+st_dn+"/JS?ci="+st_ci+"&di="+st_di+ "&pg="+st_pg+"&rf="+st_rf+"&jv="+st_v+"&tai="+st_tai+"&ai="+st_ai; var iXz = new Image(); iXz.src = st_uj; }